When you visit a licensed financial advisor, they’ll build a diversified portfolio tailored to your risk tolerance. It sounds great, but the reality?
85% of advisors underperform the S&P.
Investor returns end up 5% below the S&P.
If I were licensed, I wouldn’t be able to say things like “Earn Twice the S&P” or implement the Stars Model, because the industry’s view of risk doesn’t align with mine. Here’s what sets the Stars Model apart:
👉 Real vs. Theoretical Risk
Financial advisors rely on theoretical risk models – not actual performance. I have 26 years of real-world results, tested through all market conditions.
👉 Near-Zero Realized Risk
The Stars Model’s buy-and-hold strategy has no realized losses, with near 100% accuracy. Theoretical risks, like drawdown (portfolio dips if you sold at the bottom), don’t hold weight when you don’t sell.
👉 The Cost of Missed Opportunity
The industry overlooks this risk entirely. By not being in the Stars Model, investors lose out on 17% per year over the last 14 years. This cost far outweighs any theoretical “risk.”
👉 Outperforming the Best
The best-performing fund I’ve found matches Stars’ 25-year performance – yet Stars has outperformed it by 2x in the last 5 years.
The Bottom Line
The industry prioritizes “managing fear” with theoretical risk models. But being informed about the Stars Model gives you access to the most profitable strategy I can find – and the results speak for themselves.